Words that named things which no longer exist, words replaced by newer ones, and what you need to read a text written before the twentieth century.
I can read older Belarusian texts with support and use archaisms deliberately rather than by accident.
Schau dir diese Beispiele an. Kannst du das grammatische Muster erkennen?
Талакой паставілі хату за тыдзень.
Working together, they put up the house in a week.
Пры прыгоне сяляне не мелі права сысці.
Under serfdom the peasants had no right to leave.
Скарына надрукаваў Псалтыр у Празе ў 1517 годзе.
Skaryna printed the Psalter in Prague in 1517.
У вершы паэт піша «чало», а не «лоб».
In the poem the poet writes "chalo" rather than "lob".
Achte auf die hervorgehobenen Teile. Was haben sie gemeinsam?
A гістарызм named something that no longer exists: there is no modern word for it because there is no modern thing. An архаізм named something that still exists but has since been renamed. The difference matters because only the second has a replacement you can substitute.
| Word | What it named |
|---|---|
| ваявода | governor of a voivodeship |
| харугва | a banner, and the unit that marched under it |
| талака | collective work party, neighbours helping in turn |
| прыгон | serfdom |
| карчма | roadside inn |
| асэсар | a court official |
Талака is worth knowing beyond the reading: the practice of neighbours working each other's land in turn is still invoked as a word for collective voluntary effort.
These have modern equivalents: чало for лоб, and вусны beside губы is neutral in the explanatory dictionary rather than archaic; правіца for правая рука, рэкучы for кажучы. They survive in poetry, in fixed phrases and in deliberate stylisation.
The chancery language of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, used for its statutes and records, is the direct ancestor of modern Belarusian and is close enough to be partly readable. The main obstacles are the orthography, a large Church Slavonic layer, and verb forms the modern language has lost.
Francysk Skaryna printed the Psalter in Prague in 1517 and went on to print further books of the Bible; this is the beginning of printing in the language, and his prefaces are the usual first text a student meets.
Sparingly and knowingly. An archaism in a modern text is a signal - of solemnity, of irony, or of a historical setting. An archaism used by accident is simply an error, and the two look identical to the reader.
Wende diese Grammatik in den Übungen des Kurses C1 an
ÜbungsaufgabenTypical errors: using an archaism unintentionally, and expecting a historicism to have a modern equivalent.
Талакой паставілі хату за тыдзень.
Working together, they put up the house in a week.
<em>Талака</em> is the collective work party, still used for voluntary common effort.
Пры прыгоне сяляне не мелі права сысці.
Under serfdom the peasants had no right to leave.
A historicism: the thing is gone, so no modern word replaces it.
Скарына надрукаваў Псалтыр у Празе ў 1517 годзе.
Skaryna printed the Psalter in Prague in 1517.
The beginning of printing in the language.
У вершы паэт піша «чало», а не «лоб».
In the poem the poet writes "chalo" rather than "lob".
An archaism chosen for register, with a modern equivalent available.
У статуце Княства пісалі на старабеларускай мове.
The Statute of the Duchy was written in Old Belarusian.
The chancery language, direct ancestor of the modern one.
Der Check für dieses Thema ist noch in Arbeit
Im Kurs üben
Wende diese Grammatik in den Übungen des Kurses C1 an